From Retiring
Assistant Managing Editor R/t
R/t March
29,2004
Article by Larry Huffman
Reservoir Information &
History
Reservoir
#1 - Lake Daugherty, - Named for Eugene Daugherty, U.S. Navy,
killed in the attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii Dec. 7, 1941. Water surface
area of 11 acres, volume of 25.3 million gallons and distance around of 3,300
feet. (0.625 miles)
Reservoir
#2 - Lake Mottram, - Named in honor of Charles Mottram, United
States Marine Corps, killed in the Pacific war zone in October 1942. Water
surface area of 16.5 acres volume of 68 million gallons and distance around of
3,600 feet. (0.682 miles)
Reservoir
#3 - Lake Lambejack, - Named in honor of Gerald J. Lambejack, U.S.
Army, killed in action in Sicily, July 24, 1943. Water surface area
of 31.7 acres, volume of 95 million gallons and distance around of 6,850
feet.(1.373 miles)
Reservoir
#4 (1942) - Lake Mosier, - Named for Seaman 2/c William Mosier Jr.,
U.S. Coast Guard, lost in the North Atlantic March 9, 1944. Water surface
area of 91.3 acres, volume of 305 million gallons and distance around of 7,850
feet. (1.487 miles)
Reservoir
#5 - Lake LeComte, (1958) - Named for Lt. Charles E. LeComte,
U.S. Army Air Forces, killed in action over Italy, Jan, 22, 1944. Water
surface area of 128 acres, volume of 735.5 million gallons and distance around
of 9,500 feet. (1.799 miles)
Reservoir
#6 - Veterans' Reservoir, (1991)- Named in honor of all who have
served in the nation's armed forces. Water surface area 160 acres, volume
of 919 million gallons and distance around of 12,250 feet. (2.320
miles)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Water Key to
Fostoria's Future
In
March 11, 1941, Fostoria City Council determined to sell $200,000 in bonds and
to take options on three sites; the Fox farm, the Ernest farm and a piece of
land shared among several farms about three miles south of the
city.
At that
meeting, it was disclosed the firm interested in a greater water supply was the
National Carbon Co., Which had been awarded a War Department contract for
gas mask filters, a contract which would require use of 10 million gallons per
month of water.
D.E.
Davis, engineer with Chester Engineers of Pittsburgh, Pa., handed council a bit
of a shock when he informed them the three reservoirs in service had a capacity
of about 200 million gallons. Before his survey, the city had estimated
the storage capacity at 325 million gallons when full, which was
seldom.
Davis
then departed for Columbus, where he was working to determine the city's fire
insurance rating if three projects were completed: the water storage, a new
water tower in the east part of town and more fire apparatus.
The
city at first decided the Ernest farm would be best, but further examination of
costs showed the Fox site would hold more water and construction cost would be
less than first thought. That site was ultimately chosen.
Late in
April 1941, plans and specifications for the work were authorized, and the Homes
Construction Co. of Wooster was the successful bidder. The reservoir
question was crowded from the front pages by war developments, but reports
indicate the reservoir was ready at the end of 1941 or early 1942, and could
store 305 million gallons of water, nearly twice the other three
combined.
Though
it had taken nearly 22 years for the city to feel the need for more water, it
took only 16 until the problem arose again. More water-intensive
industries, and the spurt in population growth (nearly 1,400 between 1950 and
1960) again drove the city to increase the supply.
With
1957 coming to a close, the city began work on reservoir 5, largest of the
group, on a site west and south of Reservoirs 1 and 4. In January 1958,
structures on the site of the "proposed" reservoir were being demolished, and
the lumber reclaimed for a storage shed next to the sewage disposal plant.
The shed would house street and sewer department equipment.
As
February dawned, the city faced a protest by 15 farmers in the area, who feared
the plan would increase silt in the Portage River and in their drainage tile,
causing flooding of their farms.
In
early March, the city began meeting with the farmer's to see what could be
done. By April, the meetings had failed to bear fruit, and work
resumed. As dry weather struck, workcrews went 18-hour shifts to speed the
work.
Optimistic reports indicated the reservoir would be complete by Nov. 1 more than
doubling city capacity. By Nov. 3 the word was that the reservoir needed a
little more riprap. All was ready Nov. 17 -- well, not quite. It
seemed there was no power to the reservoir pumps Handock-Wood Electric was
reportedly getting poles as rapidly as possible, and pumps were to be tested
Dec. 5, 1958. On Dec 6, a report showed the pumps worked fine -- but the
automatic switch was missing.
Finally, by years end, the reservoir was ready, and another 735.5 million
gallons of capacity was ready to serve people and industries.
Twenty
years later, the city, almost unbelievable, again was facing problems. A
report showed the city had been down to a 26-day supply of water during the
winter of 1976-77. Mayor George Peeler proposed yet another reservoir and
a study group was named to consider the matter.
By June
1980, then Mayor Ken Beier came out against the new reservoir unless the state
kicked in much more aid than the $1.8 million promised saying the cost would be
several times that. Despite the problem, a site was selected, between
Reservoir 4 and Reservoir 5, and plans called for a 230-acre site abutting CR
23.
By
March 1982, the state had temporarily withdrawn funds, and the idea for a sixth
reservoir was dropped. However, the problem would not go away, In
September 1982, the north wall of Reservoir 3 developed a crack, and early
efforts to repair it only made the matter worse.
Then,
in May of 1984, it was necessary to reinforce the east wall of reservoir 5, as
high winds drove water over the wall.
As
things again began to fall into place, the city continued plans or the project,
even as a citizens coalition formed to battle the plan. By September 1989,
the group had lost the court fight to halt the work, but was able to place a
referendum on the November ballot.
The
referendum (against) passed, but a court ruled that, under state law the work
was under contract, and must go forward. By the end of construction in
1991, the reservoir, first proposed in a 1965 water study and promoted more
heavily in the 1970's was in place adding 919 million gallons
to the city's
supply.
Perhaps
ironically, during the citizens campaign, based on the proviso that a falling
population made the expansion unnecessary, the city again face a water shortage
when drought brought the storage to less than a months use.
Today
citizens have a water supply reported sufficient for three years at full
capacity with recreation and fishing areas for the citizens'
enjoyment.
-------------------------
Note; A couple
years ago when cities and towns in the area were rationing water to its
residents Fostoria at the time had over seven hundred (700) days
supply in storage at normal daily water
usage.
From R/t May 26, 2001